Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 04:56
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
These U.S. States Have the Highest Rates of Dementia - Gizmodo
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Are there scientific studies that support the detox benefits of an infrared sauna blanket?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Want $8,665 A Year In Passive Income, Invest $25,000 In These High Yield Stocks - 24/7 Wall St.
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Common sleep aid blocks brain inflammation and tau buildup in Alzheimer’s model - PsyPost
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
The FC Bayern squad for the Club World Cup - FC Bayern Munich
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
America’s Small Businesses Hopeful of Boost From Trump’s Spending Bill - WSJ
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.